Theological Worldview

I took this quiz to figure out my theological worldview... (click here to take it yourself)

Results for me:

"You are Emergent/Postmodern in my theology. You feel alienated from older forms of church, you don't think they connect to modern culture very well. No one knows the whole truth about God, and we have much to learn from each other, and so learning takes place in dialogue. Evangelism should take place in relationships rather than through crusades and altar-calls. People are interested in spirituality and want to ask questions, so the church should help them to do this."

Emergent/Postmodern 86% Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 61% Neo orthodox 57% Classical Liberal 54% Roman Catholic 50% Modern Liberal 43% Charismatic/Pentecostal 43% Reformed Evangelical 18% Fundamentalist 4%

Happenings

I haven't posted in a couple of weeks, and I have a couple of books I will review in the next little while, but I have been following our United Methodist General Conference 2008 in DFW. I have to say that I am not overly optimistic, but cautiously hopeful. Our first step will be to admit that we actually have an issue that divides us. Without that healing is hopeless. Stay tuned, and you can follow the news at www.umc.org.

"The Failure of Nerve"

I just finished this magnificent book by Edwin Friedman. Building on his earlier work in Generation to Generation, Friedman was working on this book on leadership at the time of his death in 1996. Friedman's wife worked with several of his colleagues to bring the manuscript to print -- at least, the 300+ pages that Friedman had written by that point. The first five chapters are thorough; the latter five chapters are somewhat more sketchy; but there is enough material here that the interested reader can get a pretty good glimpse of where Friedman was headed.

Friedman's thesis: there is a "failure of nerve" in American civilization today. "There exists," he says, "throughout America today a rampant sabotaging of leaders who try to stand tall amidst the raging anxiety-storms of our time. It is a highly reactive atmosphere pervading all the institutions of our society -- a regressive mood that contaminates the decision-making processes of government and corporations at the highest level, and, on the local level, seeps down into the deliberations of neighborhood church, synagogue, hospital, library, and school boards." This reactivity leads to what he calls a "leadership-toxic climate" that makes it exceptionally difficult for clear, decisive, well-defined leadership to function effectively. The book, he says, "is about leadership in the land of the quick fix, about leadership in a society so reactive that it cannot choose leaders who might calm its anxiety."

He talks a lot about developing into "well-differentiated leaders," which is not an autocratic boss who coerces others, but is any leader who takes responsibility for their own emotional being and destiny. This kind of leader has clarity about his or her life goals, and, therefore is less likely to become lost in the anxious emotional processes swirling about. How do we remain separate while still remaining connected, and therefore maintain a non-anxious/challenging presence? Leaders must manage their own reactivity to the automatic reactivity of others. We don't need more information, we need leaders who understand the power of their presence!

In his first chapter, "Imaginative Gridlock and the Spirit of Adventure," Friedman talks about a powerful connection between New World explorers leading Western society out of the dark ages, and the need for such leaders in our world today. Friedman describes our society, at present, as "chronically anxious," featuring five distinguishing characteristics: reactivity, hearding, blame displacement, a quick-fix mentality, and a lack of well-differentiated leadership.

I found his chapter on "empathy" to be particularly challenging and compelling, but on the whole this book is deeply profound. I think I will now find myself filtering just about everything else I read on the subject of leadership through this lens. I think it will help me to become more self-differentiated, to have a clearer understanding of my task and purpose (or, perhaps more accurately, my presence), and to raise my level of courage and stamina that is rooted in the love of God demonstrated to us in Christ.

Into the Wild...

I finished "Into the Wild" by Jon Krakauer, and found it to be one of those books that haunts me a little bit. I guess it was also made into a film, but I haven't seen it yet. It is about Chris McCandless, a 24 year-0ld kid, who upon graduating from college, gives away about $25,000 and sets out on a nomadic, ascetic lifestyle hitchhiking throughout western N. America from Mexico to Alaska where he perishes alone. Was Chris mentally "off," or was he on a quest to find a truer meaning behind life? His ascetic lifestyle, search for truth and beauty, as well as his thirst for knowledge was countered by his troubled relationships with his parents. It is not an easy book to categorize, but maybe that is why I found it to be profound. There are no easy answers, but Chris (through this story) has had an impact on my life.